rtk
Fantasy Football Veteran
Posts: 87
|
Post by rtk on Nov 8, 2008 10:43:58 GMT -8
I am in a standard-scoring, ten-team non-ppr league. The first place and second place teams in our league made a blockbuster trade a few days ago. I have never felt like a freely negotiated trade should have been vetoed by the commissioner in the three years I have been playing fantasy football. But this one left me wondering. Team A, who is currently in 1st place and has far and away the best team in our league got Frank Gore and Greg Jennings. In exchange, he gave up Plaxico Burress (who has personal problems right now) and Steven Jackson (who is injured and not expected to play in the next two games). Even with the injury issues aside, in my mind Gore and Jennings are both top-10 at their position and Burress and Jackson are not. This trade pretty much handed the number one guy the championship. It is clear to me that the number 1 guy got the better end of this, but was it so unfair that it should not have been allowed? Interested in other opinions. Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by Bruno Boys Ziza on Nov 12, 2008 19:06:23 GMT -8
rtk 0 If it is the second place team that did this to himself, there really isn't too much to say. Personally, when healthy I think that SJax and Plax would be the better players to have.
-Bruno Boys Ziza
|
|